Welcome To aBlackWeb

Documentary Accusing MJ of Child Abuse Premiering At Sundance

I took a nap w my 4 y old nephew the other day ......was reading w him and we both passed out.... hope that never comes back to haunt me

That aint the same as having kids not related to you at your house without the parents and sleeping all night. A nap on the couch aint the same
 
Well that was my next question. The parents of these kids....what was their connection to mj? Or were they just fans?
Honestly it’s human nature to want to be around successful ppl....homie is the biggest star in the world....rich as shit ..taking interest in y’all and bankrolling ur lifestyle...they trusted him and were enamored w all that shit that come w it
 
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/michael...hbos-leaving-neverland-would-still-be-unfair/

Here, Leaving Neverland fails on both counts.

Part one, broadcast for two hours Sunday night, completely withheld all potentially problematic information from the audience, as Robson and Safechuck were given about an hour each to tell their stories in the most sympathetic light imaginable. There was not one remotely skeptical question, any semblance of a constraint on what they could say about Jackson, and absolutely not even one second for what passed as a rebuttal to the horrific allegations being made against him.

It wasn’t until part two, Monday night, when Reed finally let his audience, which has already become emotionally invested in his subjects, know the following facts, for instance, about Robson:

  • He testified on Jackson’s behalf in a civil matter when he was about 12, which he now says was five years into his seven years of continual sexual abuse.
  • He testified on Jackson’s behalf in the criminal trial when he was about 22, and a celebrity in his own right.
  • His mother and sister also strongly testified on Jackson’s behalf at the criminal trial.
  • Both his mother and his then-soon-to-be wife asked him point-blank before the criminal trial if Jackson had ever done anything wrong to him, and he completely convinced both of them that he had not.
  • When Jackson died, he issued a glowing statement of extraordinary praise of Jackson and attended his funeral.
  • His story only radically changed four years later when he filed a lawsuit against Jackson’s estate, which failed on statute of limitations grounds.
None of this proves that Robson is lying, and the story of abuse that Robson tells now is extremely graphic and seemingly credible. But that’s not the real issue.

The problem is that allowing someone with that factual background to tell their story essentially unedited, without a hint of scrutiny, without a shred of corroboration, about an un-convicted dead man, is both wrong and treacherous. Quite simply, you can’t have a “he said, he said” situation about such an incredibly inflammatory charge, especially when one of the two people who were in the room is dead, and the other one told the 100% opposite story while under oath, twice (and, if you do, you should damn well interview some people representing the other side, which Leaving Neverland does not).

While Oprah (who, it should be pointed out, played a key role in the Michael Jackson hype machine back in the day) at least made meager efforts to promote some semblance of fairness by reading a blistering statement for the Jackson family, and gently asking a couple of half-way decent questions, she was very poorly positioned to take part in this project. Oprah — an abuse victim herself — has championed this cause, and comes off as too invested in believing all abuse allegations to give stories like these the scrutiny that a journalistic endeavor should demand, regardless of how politically incorrect it may be to do so, or how truthful those stories may end up being.
 
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/michael...hbos-leaving-neverland-would-still-be-unfair/

Here, Leaving Neverland fails on both counts.

Part one, broadcast for two hours Sunday night, completely withheld all potentially problematic information from the audience, as Robson and Safechuck were given about an hour each to tell their stories in the most sympathetic light imaginable. There was not one remotely skeptical question, any semblance of a constraint on what they could say about Jackson, and absolutely not even one second for what passed as a rebuttal to the horrific allegations being made against him.

It wasn’t until part two, Monday night, when Reed finally let his audience, which has already become emotionally invested in his subjects, know the following facts, for instance, about Robson:

  • He testified on Jackson’s behalf in a civil matter when he was about 12, which he now says was five years into his seven years of continual sexual abuse.
  • He testified on Jackson’s behalf in the criminal trial when he was about 22, and a celebrity in his own right.
  • His mother and sister also strongly testified on Jackson’s behalf at the criminal trial.
  • Both his mother and his then-soon-to-be wife asked him point-blank before the criminal trial if Jackson had ever done anything wrong to him, and he completely convinced both of them that he had not.
  • When Jackson died, he issued a glowing statement of extraordinary praise of Jackson and attended his funeral.
  • His story only radically changed four years later when he filed a lawsuit against Jackson’s estate, which failed on statute of limitations grounds.
None of this proves that Robson is lying, and the story of abuse that Robson tells now is extremely graphic and seemingly credible. But that’s not the real issue.

The problem is that allowing someone with that factual background to tell their story essentially unedited, without a hint of scrutiny, without a shred of corroboration, about an un-convicted dead man, is both wrong and treacherous. Quite simply, you can’t have a “he said, he said” situation about such an incredibly inflammatory charge, especially when one of the two people who were in the room is dead, and the other one told the 100% opposite story while under oath, twice (and, if you do, you should damn well interview some people representing the other side, which Leaving Neverland does not).

While Oprah (who, it should be pointed out, played a key role in the Michael Jackson hype machine back in the day) at least made meager efforts to promote some semblance of fairness by reading a blistering statement for the Jackson family, and gently asking a couple of half-way decent questions, she was very poorly positioned to take part in this project. Oprah — an abuse victim herself — has championed this cause, and comes off as too invested in believing all abuse allegations to give stories like these the scrutiny that a journalistic endeavor should demand, regardless of how politically incorrect it may be to do so, or how truthful those stories may end up being.

John Ziegler is a guy who likes going around defending Sandusky.. He’s not the guy to use to defend Michael Jackson...
 
Last edited:
Honestly it’s human nature to want to be around successful ppl....homie is the biggest star in the world....rich as shit ..taking interest in y’all and bankrolling ur lifestyle...they trusted him and were enamored w all that shit that come w it
Those parents are trash. Pedophile or not theyre leaving their children vulnerable for what in the end really amounts to nothing. I couldnt ever imagine doing that with mine for some damn money or some kinda celeb fetish.

Throw em all in the garbage.
 
Those parents are trash. Pedophile or not theyre leaving their children vulnerable for what in the end really amounts to nothing. I couldnt ever imagine doing that with mine for some damn money or some kinda celeb fetish.

Throw em all in the garbage.
Add to that they were out to get money. Not to get Mike put in jail. They didn't care about their kids getting molested for the right price.
 
Last edited:
Still nobody explaining why he sleep in the bed with mad kids.

Coulda swore I've seen/heard folks say Mike didn't sleep in the bed w/ them

he slept on the floor, while they slept in the bed



not sayin that absolves him if true, but provides a lil context

Mike himself, as well as others who were kids at the time, said he never slept in the bed w/ them


since that's the narrative most folks runnin w/, would your stance change a lil knowing that?
 
But where the evidence that they was fucked though?

You know, messing with kids sexual is what makes you a pedo right?


Innocent till proof comes out
 
But where the evidence that they was fucked though?

You know, messing with kids sexual is what makes you a pedo right?


Innocent till proof comes out
That don't work for black folk...
.we guilt until innocent and when proven innocent....we are assumed guilty for all other shit
 
These allegations have ALWAYS been around it just took a fuckin lifetime movie for people to take it serious because society is shallow AF.

As for R. Kelly, he's being hemmed up for charges on video footage from the 90s. There's no conspiracy, R. Kelly is just sick and niggas know better.

Is it gonna stop me from listening to Beat It or the remix to Ignition ? Nope. Separate the men from the music and stop taking entertainment so literal and worshipping these artists.

Apparently that’s only allowed to be done for Elvis and white rock bands from 60’s,70’s and 80’s...
 
whats crazy that alot of people missed..
mike was married to elvis' daughter lisa marie.
the daughter he had with underage priscilla. she wasnt underage when she was born...but still
 
whats crazy that alot of people missed..
mike was married to elvis' daughter lisa marie.
the daughter he had with underage priscilla. she wasnt underage when she was born...but still

That whole marriage to Lisa Marie showed what a weird nigga Mike was.. Because a real nigga would had her barefoot and pregnant a least twice before the marriage ended.. And they would’ve done that shit all for the culture.. Plus that would’ve had Elvis’ coked up cultural apportioning obese ass trying and failing to roll over in his grave...
 
Last edited:
That whole marriage to Lisa Marie showed what weird nigga Mike was.. Because a real nigga would had her barefoot and pregnant a least twice before the marriage ended.. And they would’ve done that shit all for the culture.. Plus that would’ve had Elvis’ coked up cultural apportioning obese ass trying and failing to roll over in his grave...
he was trynna get at them elvis royalties.
 
Back
Top