Welcome To aBlackWeb

Amazon will pay $0 in taxes on $11,200,000,000 in profit for 2018

VIBE

Welcome to the New Era
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/amazon-taxes-zero-180337770.html

While some people have received some surprise tax bills when filing their returns, corporations continue to avoid paying tax — thanks to a cocktail of tax credits, loopholes, and exemptions.

According to a report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), Amazon (AMZN) will pay nothing in federal income taxes for the second year in a row.

Thanks to the new Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), Amazon’s federal tax responsibility is 21% (down from 35% in previous years). But with the help of tax breaks, Amazon won’t be paying a dime to Uncle Sam despite posting more than $11 billion in profits in 2018.

How is that possible?

“It’s hard to know exactly what they’re doing,” said Steve Wamhoff, ITEP’s Director of Federal Tax Policy. “In their public documents they don’t lay out their tax strategy. So it’s unclear exactly which breaks [the company is taking advantage of]. They vaguely say tax credits. One could think of many different ways a corporation could do this, like the depreciation breaks which were expanded under TCJA.”

‘It’s hard to tell’

Though Amazon might have taken advantage of new breaks and loopholes available under TCJA, this isn’t the first year that Amazon has avoided paying federal tax. The company reported $5.6 billion in U.S. profits in 2017 and paid $0 last year as well.

"Amazon pays all the taxes we are required to pay in the U.S. and every country where we operate, including paying $2.6 billion in corporate tax and reporting $3.4 billion in tax expense over the last three years," an Amazon spokesperson said in a statement.

According to Wamhoff, the company’s apparently nonexistent tax bill highlights that there have always been issues with corporate tax liability.

“The thing we would need to know is would they have had positive corporate income tax liability were it not for TCJA?” Wamhoff asked. “Maybe. It’s hard to tell.”

E732C30D-D095-415A-AE8B-5D2FC3E9B542.png

Revelations about Amazon’s tax liability come despite President Trump’s very public criticisms of Amazon and Bezos for not paying enough tax. The president had promised his new tax law would end special interest breaks and close loopholes, but it’s clear that isn’t the case, says Wamhoff.

“This is another situation where the rhetoric from President Trump is completely divorced from what he does and what his policies do,” explained Wamhoff. “The part about cutting corporate tax rate was true. And they eliminated some corporate tax rates but not all.”

He added: “The corporate tax revenue was a big loser. We aren’t going to see corporations suddenly paying more. We see that in the case of Amazon.”

Declining tax revenue has only widened deficits, as national debt has ballooned up and over $22 trillion.

Amazon not alone

TCJA had been criticized in large part due to the benefits it provided the wealthiest Americans and big corporations. Wamhoff says it’s ironic that the corporate tax rate was slashed to 21% (from its previous 35%) because the effective corporate tax rate under previous tax law was 21%, after accounting for tax breaks and loopholes.

Therefore, Wamhoff says, we’ll likely see the effective tax rate fall even lower.

But if anyone thinks that Amazon is alone, they would be wrong. Last week, Netflix also did not pay American federal or state income taxes according to a separate ITEP report, despite posting record profits. Netflix has disputed those findings, while ITEP claims that the $131 million paid by Netflix is taxes on foreign income.

And historically Wamhoff says, this story is nothing new. Several corporations have avoided paying federal income tax throughout the years, he says.

“These companies have been consistently profitable,” he explained. “And they should really be paying taxes.”
 
Trickle down lmao
I mean it did trickle down, got a Lexus plant down here that spit out Amazon Van's that people buy. Then they contract with Amazon to own area of town that they exclusively deliver packages to and get paid by delivery, like a ups uber.

I guess the trade off is the jobs it creates, and those people get taxed. So that makes up the taxes they didnt pay.

tenor (8).gif
It is what it is
 
I mean it did trickle down, got a Lexus plant down here that spit out Amazon Van's that people buy. Then they contract with Amazon to own area of town that they exclusively deliver packages to and get paid by delivery, like a ups uber.

I guess the trade off is the jobs it creates, and those people get taxed. So that makes up the taxes they didnt pay.

View attachment 111510
It is what it is

11bn is that? That plant would have happened no matter how much tax they paid
 
they actually got something like 129M back somehow so they basically paid negative taxes.

I mean it did trickle down, got a Lexus plant down here that spit out Amazon Van's that people buy. Then they contract with Amazon to own area of town that they exclusively deliver packages to and get paid by delivery, like a ups uber.

I guess the trade off is the jobs it creates, and those people get taxed. So that makes up the taxes they didnt pay.

View attachment 111510
It is what it is

This line of reasoning bugs me so much. Companies don't create jobs they hire workers. A job isn't some favor being done by some benevolent entity it's what makes that entity able to function in the first place.
 
they actually got something like 129M back somehow so they basically paid negative taxes.



This line of reasoning bugs me so much. Companies don't create jobs they hire workers. A job isn't some favor being done by some benevolent entity it's what makes that entity able to function in the first place.
How does what u said dispell the point I made, you seem to just not agree with my identification of the variables. But do not seem to counter the context of the argument I made.
 
How does what u said dispell the point I made, you seem to just not agree with my identification of the variables. But do not seem to counter the context of the argument I made.


The point you made wasn't really a point though. If Amazon is tax exempt simply because it has employees who pay taxes then every company is tax exempt.

But again - a job isn't a favor that these companies are doing for people it's a necessity for them to make their 11 billion dollars. If anything Amazon should be paying taxes and the employees shouldn't.
 
Please tell me more about how Bertha Faye, Shanquashia, and Lupita down the street are killing this country with their 12k a year in food stamps/WIC/etc. Make America Great Again and properly distribute the taxes. And if you think this is only Amazon, you're insane.
 
Back
Top